Ruell v. City of Alpena
This text of 66 N.W. 49 (Ruell v. City of Alpena) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
(after stating the facts). Under both the old and amended charters, the exclusive power to fix salaries was in the common council. The provisions of the ordinance, enacted under the old charter, fixing the salaries of the police officers, were not repealed by that provision of the amended charter authorizing the formation of a board of commissioners and giving it control of the police department. The council had taken no other action fixing the plaintiff’s salary, and it was therefore governed by the ordinance. Miller v. Board of Auditors, 41 Mich. 4. See, also, People v. Board of Police, 75 N. Y. 38; Kehn v. State, 93 N. Y. 294; Ryce v. City of Osage, 88 Iowa, 558.
Reversed, and new trial ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
66 N.W. 49, 108 Mich. 290, 1896 Mich. LEXIS 966, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruell-v-city-of-alpena-mich-1896.