Rue v. Sprague & Consaulis
1 Johns. 493
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rue v. Sprague & Consaulis. Read the opinion of the Court — 1 Johns. 510 →
Opinion
. „ The party is too late, after an assignment of errors to move to amend the return. Before assigning errors, he ought to have applied to a judge for an enlargement of the rule ; and the reasons assigned in his affidavit, for not obtaining, such an order are insufficient.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rue v. Sprague & Consaulis, 1 Johns. 493 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1806).
1 Johns. 493 (Rue v. Sprague & Consaulis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.