Rue v. Sprague & Consaulis
1 Johns. 510
This text of 1 Johns. 510 (Rue v. Sprague & Consaulis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rue v. Sprague & Consaulis, 1 Johns. 510 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1806).
Opinion
The proceedings were under the 20 th section of the act, which directs, that the penalty is to be recovered in the manner providedby the ISthsection, where it is said that the penalty is to be recovered in the name of the person who makes the complaint. And according to' our decision in the case of Bennett and Ward,
Judgment reversed.
3 Caines, 259.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Croker v. New York Trust Co.
156 N.E. 81 (New York Court of Appeals, 1927)
Jordan, Ellis & Co. v. James
5 Ohio 88 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1831)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Johns. 510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rue-v-sprague-consaulis-nysupct-1806.