Rudolph Technologies, Inc. v. Camtek, Ltd.

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

RUDOLPH TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CAMTEK, LTD., Defendant-Appellant ______________________

2015-1434 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota in No. 0:05-cv-01396-JRT-FLN, Judge John R. Tunheim. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

DANIEL W. MCDONALD, Merchant & Gould P.C., Min- neapolis, MN, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also repre- sented by RACHEL C. HUGHEY, MICHAEL A. ERBELE.

DANIEL HOWARD BROMBERG, Quinn Emanuel Ur- quhart & Sullivan, LLP, Redwood Shores, CA, argued for defendant-appellant. Also represented by CLAUDE M. STERN; DAVID LEON BILSKER, San Francisco, CA. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, O’MALLEY, and WALLACH, Cir- cuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 3, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court