Rucker v. Davis
222 F.3d 614, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 9211, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6951, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 21066, 2000 WL 1199526
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 18, 2000·No. Nos. 98-16322, 98-16542·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court,1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rucker v. Davis, 222 F.3d 614, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 9211, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6951, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 21066, 2000 WL 1199526 (9th Cir. 2000).
222 F.3d 614 (Rucker v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rucker v. Davis
237 F.3d 1113 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)