Ruby Clavelle v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ruby Clavelle v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 15, 2016

Docket15-4486

StatusPublished

This text of Ruby Clavelle v. State of Florida (Ruby Clavelle v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ruby Clavelle v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

RUBY CLAVELLE, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D15-4486

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent. ___________________________/

Opinion filed May 16, 2016.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus -- Original Jurisdiction.

Ruby Clavelle, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm’n,

807 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). “We do, however, encourage the circuit court to

promptly rule on the merits of the claim before it.” Id. at 733.

PETITION DENIED.

WOLF, WETHERELL, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI