Ruben Ortiz Haro v. the State of Texas
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 6, 2024
NO. 03-20-00128-CR
Ruben Ortiz Haro, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
APPEAL FROM THE 119TH DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES TRIANA, KELLY, AND SMITH AFFIRMED ON REMAND-- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY
This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed the
record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in
the judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Because
appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ruben Ortiz Haro v. the State of Texas (Ruben Ortiz Haro v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.