Ruben Ortiz Haro v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 6, 2024·No. 03-20-00128-CR·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 6, 2024

NO. 03-20-00128-CR

Ruben Ortiz Haro, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 119TH DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES TRIANA, KELLY, AND SMITH AFFIRMED ON REMAND-- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed the

record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in

the judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Because

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ruben Ortiz Haro v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Ruben Ortiz Haro v. the State of Texas (Ruben Ortiz Haro v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.