Ruben Ortiz Haro v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 6, 2022·No. 03-20-00128-CR·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 6, 2022

NO. 03-20-00128-CR

Ruben Ortiz Haro, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 119TH DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, TRIANA, AND KELLY AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the judgments of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment of conviction for Count One of the indictment, to wit: Promotion of

Child Pornography. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction for

Count One. The Court further holds that there was reversible error in the trial court’s judgment

of conviction for Count Two of the indictment, to wit: Possession of Child Pornography.

Therefore, the Court vacates the trial court’s judgment of conviction for Count Two. Because

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ruben Ortiz Haro v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Ruben Ortiz Haro v. the State of Texas (Ruben Ortiz Haro v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.