Ruben Ortiz Haro v. the State of Texas
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 6, 2022
NO. 03-20-00128-CR
Ruben Ortiz Haro, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
APPEAL FROM THE 119TH DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, TRIANA, AND KELLY AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY
This is an appeal from the judgments of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed
the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the
trial court’s judgment of conviction for Count One of the indictment, to wit: Promotion of
Child Pornography. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction for
Count One. The Court further holds that there was reversible error in the trial court’s judgment
of conviction for Count Two of the indictment, to wit: Possession of Child Pornography.
Therefore, the Court vacates the trial court’s judgment of conviction for Count Two. Because
appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ruben Ortiz Haro v. the State of Texas (Ruben Ortiz Haro v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.