Home/Supreme Court/Ruark v. Colorado

Ruark v. Colorado

378 U.S. 585, 84 S. Ct. 1935, 12 L. Ed. 2d 1042, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 874
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 22, 1964·No. 1173 M·Published·Cited by 35 cases

Opinion

378 U.S. 585 (1964)

RUARK
v.
COLORADO.

No. 1173, Misc.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 22, 1964.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO.

Petitioner pro se.

Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Attorney General, and John E. Bush, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Colorado for consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, dissenting.

For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Smith v. Crouse, ante, p. 584, I would set this case for argument.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ruark v. Colorado, 378 U.S. 585, 84 S. Ct. 1935, 12 L. Ed. 2d 1042, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 874 (1964).

378 U.S. 585 (Ruark v. Colorado) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Patrick
345 S.E.2d 481 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1986)
United States v. Daniel P. Flemino
691 F.2d 1263 (Eighth Circuit, 1982)
United States v. Carolyn Porter Fuel, United States of America v. Merle O. Greene, Jr. And Julia Greene
583 F.2d 978 (Eighth Circuit, 1978)
United States v. Thomas Murphy Donahue
539 F.2d 1131 (Eighth Circuit, 1976)
Williams v. Leeke
184 S.E.2d 441 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1971)
United States v. Tuggles
334 F. Supp. 383 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1971)
United States v. Sklaroff
323 F. Supp. 296 (S.D. Florida, 1971)
State v. Reams
178 S.E.2d 65 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1970)
Harold Hanger v. United States of America, Gale Mixen v. United States of America, Loretta Meyer v. United States
398 F.2d 91 (Eighth Circuit, 1968)
United States v. Maxie Thomas and Wilbur Wiggins
396 F.2d 310 (Second Circuit, 1968)
In Re Mitchell
437 P.2d 289 (California Supreme Court, 1968)
Norbert D. Terlikowski v. United States of America, James Slawek v. United States
379 F.2d 501 (Eighth Circuit, 1967)
Sheilah C. Hicks v. United States
382 F.2d 158 (D.C. Circuit, 1967)
United States v. Leighton
265 F. Supp. 27 (S.D. New York, 1967)
United States v. Wood
270 F. Supp. 963 (S.D. New York, 1967)
Rex M. Haggard v. United States of America, Lee Alley v. United States
369 F.2d 968 (Eighth Circuit, 1966)
Donnell v. Swenson
258 F. Supp. 317 (W.D. Missouri, 1966)
United States v. George Barrow, Benny Bonanno, Fred Dipatrizio, Joseph Mattia and Pasquale Pillo
363 F.2d 62 (Third Circuit, 1966)
Cruz v. Patterson
253 F. Supp. 805 (D. Colorado, 1966)
United States v. Thomas
250 F. Supp. 771 (S.D. New York, 1966)