R.T. Vanderbilt Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co.

171 A.3d 61, 327 Conn. 925, 2017 Conn. LEXIS 322
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided October 18, 2017·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The cross petition by the plaintiff Vanderbilt Minerals, LLC, as successor to R.T. Vanderbilt Company, Inc., for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 171 Conn.App. 61, 156 A.3d 539 (2017), is granted, limited to the following question:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly interpret occupational disease exclusion clauses in certain insurance policies as precluding coverage for claims of occupational disease, regardless of whether the claimant was employed by the policyholder or by a third party user of the claimant's allegedly harmful product?"

McDONALD, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

R.T. Vanderbilt Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co., 171 A.3d 61, 327 Conn. 925, 2017 Conn. LEXIS 322 (Colo. 2017).

171 A.3d 61 (R.T. Vanderbilt Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related