R.T. Vanderbilt Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

R.T. Vanderbilt Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co.

171 A.3d 61, 327 Conn. 925, 2017 Conn. LEXIS 322

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedOctober 18, 2017

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 171 A.3d 61 (R.T. Vanderbilt Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

R.T. Vanderbilt Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co., 171 A.3d 61, 327 Conn. 925, 2017 Conn. LEXIS 322 (Colo. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

The cross petition by the plaintiff Vanderbilt Minerals, LLC, as successor to R.T. Vanderbilt Company, Inc., for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 171 Conn.App. 61, 156 A.3d 539 (2017), is granted, limited to the following question:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly interpret occupational disease exclusion clauses in certain insurance policies as precluding coverage for claims of occupational disease, regardless of whether the claimant was employed by the policyholder or by a third party user of the claimant's allegedly harmful product?"

McDONALD, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The cross petition by the plaintiff Vanderbilt Minerals, LLC, as successor to R.T. Vanderbilt Company, Inc., for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 171 Conn.App. 61, 156 A.3d 539 (2017), is granted, limited to the following question:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly interpret occupational disease exclusion clauses in certain insurance policies as precluding coverage for claims of occupational disease, regardless of whether the claimant was employed by the policyholder or by a third party user of the claimant's allegedly harmful product?"

McDONALD, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

171 A.3d 61, 327 Conn. 925, 2017 Conn. LEXIS 322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rt-vanderbilt-co-v-hartford-accident-indem-co-conn-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack