Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Royce v. State

Royce v. State

141 So. 3d 1278, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 11014, 2014 WL 3543911
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 18, 2014
Docket2D13-2484
StatusPublished

This text of 141 So. 3d 1278 (Royce v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Royce v. State, 141 So. 3d 1278, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 11014, 2014 WL 3543911 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

*1279 KHOUZAM, Judge.

Robert Earl Royce challenges an order revoking his probation. We affirm in all respects except to point out a scrivener’s error in the order, which indicates that Royce was found in violation of condition five of his probation when in fact the State agreed to drop the violation as part of the plea bargain. We remand for the correction of this scrivener’s error. See Latner v. State, 132 So.3d 364, 365 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014). Royce need not be present for this correction.

Affirmed; remanded with instructions.

MORRIS and SLEET, JJ„ Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Latner v. State
132 So. 3d 364 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
141 So. 3d 1278, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 11014, 2014 WL 3543911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/royce-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.