Latner v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Latner v. State

132 So. 3d 364, 2014 WL 483582, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1740

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 7, 2014·No. No. 1D13-2987·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders appeal, we affirm the judgment and sentence but remand for correction of a scrivener’s error. The record indicates that the state charged the appellant with three counts of aggravated assault. However, as part of the plea agreement the state agreed to nolle prosse one of the aggravated assault charges. The judgment reflects that the appellant was convicted of all three aggravated assault charges. This appears to be a scrivener’s error.

We therefore remand the judgment for the trial court to enter an amended judgment striking the third aggravated assault charge.

AFFIRMED, but REMANDED with instructions to correct the scrivener’s error.

LEWIS, C.J., WETHERELL and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders appeal, we affirm the judgment and sentence but remand for correction of a scrivener’s error. The record indicates that the state charged the appellant with three counts of aggravated assault. However, as part of the plea agreement the state agreed to nolle prosse one of the aggravated assault charges. The judgment reflects that the appellant was convicted of all three aggravated assault charges. This appears to be a scrivener’s error.

We therefore remand the judgment for the trial court to enter an amended judgment striking the third aggravated assault charge.

AFFIRMED, but REMANDED with instructions to correct the scrivener’s error.

LEWIS, C.J., WETHERELL and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Latner v. State, 132 So. 3d 364, 2014 WL 483582, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1740 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

132 So. 3d 364 (Latner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related