Royal Indemnity Co. v. United States

92 F. Supp. 1003, 117 Ct. Cl. 580, 39 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1148, 1950 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 6
CourtUnited States Court of Claims
DecidedOctober 2, 1950
DocketNo. 46617
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 92 F. Supp. 1003 (Royal Indemnity Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Royal Indemnity Co. v. United States, 92 F. Supp. 1003, 117 Ct. Cl. 580, 39 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1148, 1950 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 6 (cc 1950).

Opinion

LittletoN, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

In this case the plaintiff seeks to recover $93,545.80 with interest from January 28, 1942, representing the fourth installment of income and profits taxes, with interest, shown to be due upon the return for the calendar year 1918 filed by the Louisville Woolen Mills, a corporation, and which tax was duly assessed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue against said corporation. The separate corporation income and profits-tax return filed by the Louisville Woolen Mills for 1918 showed a total income and profits tax due in the sum of $129,364.93. The corporation elected to pay the tax so assessed in quarterly installments, and the first three installments amounting to $97,023.69 were duly paid, leaving a balance of $32,341.24 unpaid which represented the fourth installment due December 15, 1919. On December 20, 1919, the taxpayer, believing that it was entitled to some relief in connection with its excess profits taxes under the provisions of Sections 327 (d) and 328 of the Revenue Act of 1918, filed a request with the Commissioner of Internal Revenue for such relief and at the same time prepared and filed with the Collector of Internal Revenue a claim for abatement of the fourth installment of tax in the amount above-mentioned. In connection with this claim for abatement the Louisville Woolen Mills furnished to the Collector a surety bond for the payment of said balance remaining due, with interest, with the Royal Indemnity Company of New York, the plaintiff herein, as surety on said bond. This bond is set forth in full in Finding 3.

In the audit of the return of the Louisville Woolen Mills and returns of certain other corporations, the Commissioner [598]*598of Internal Revenue determined that the Louisville Woolen Mills and three other corporations, referred to in the findings, were affiliated with the American Textile Woolen Company, a Tennessee corporation, for the calendar year 1918 and other years, within the meaning of Section 240 of the Revenue Act of 1918, and that the income and excess profits taxes of these corporations should be determined and computed upon a consolidated basis under Section 240 of the taxing act and regulations prescribed by the Commissioner.1 The American Textile Woolen Company owned all of the capital stock of the Louisville Woolen Mills, Athens Woolen Mills, Sweetwater Woolen Mills, and the Park Woolen Mills. This case involves only the claim for refund by the plaintiff of the fourth installment of the tax, plus interest, paid by it under its surety bond pursuant to a judgment on said bond of the U. S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky, which was affirmed on appeal, 120 Fed. (2d) 136.

On October 26,1920, the Commissioner, after having made a preliminary audit of the returns filed by the several corporations above-mentioned, mailed to the American Textile Woolen Company, the parent corporation, an audit letter proposing an additional consolidated income and excess profits tax for the consolidated group of $400,885.61 covering the years 1917,1918, and 1919. Following the receipt of this preliminary audit letter the American Textile Woolen Company, as the parent corporation of the consolidated group, prepared and sent to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue a consolidated return for 1918 on which it computed a total ■consolidated tax liability for the group of $351,034.14. No [599]*599assessment was ever made against American or any of the affiliated corporations upon this return and the amount computed thereon was never formally assessed by the Commissioner. The total income and excess profits taxes which had been shown to be due upon the separate corporation income and profits-tax returns filed by the several corporations in the affiliated group, including American Textile Woolen Company, were $295,610.74. The amounts totaling this sum had been formally assessed by the Commissioner and had all been paid by the several corporations except the last installment of $32,341.24 shown to be due on the return filed by Louisville Woolen Mills. Tn connection with the Commissioner’s audit letter of October 26, 1920, and a consolidated tax liability of $351,034.14 computed by American, as above referred to, the American Company sent to the Collector of Internal Revenue, at Nashville, its check dated November 17, 1921, for $100,000 to apply on the proposed additional tax indicated in the Commissioner’s audit letter. (See Finding 4.)

From this point forward until the final decision was made with respect to the consolidated tax liability of the affiliated group by the Tax Court on January 16, 1932, and the TJ. S. Circuit Court of Appeals on February 16, 1934, 68 Fed. (2d) 820, the matter of the tax liability of the consolidated group was handled before the Commissioner and the courts by the American Textile Woolen Company, the parent corporation. During this time the abatement claim, which had been filed by the Louisville Woolen Mills, was held under consideration by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, and the surety bond which had been given for the last installment of the tax previously assessed against that corporation on the separate return which it had filed, remained in effect.

All the notices, audits, and determinations, which were made by the Commissioner relative to the tax liability of the consolidated group of the deficiencies in such tax for the calendar years 1917,1918 and 1919, were sent to the parent corporation, the American Textile Woolen Company. As shown in Findings 11-14, the Commissioner made his final determination on October 7,1925, of a total consolidated tax liability of $429,539.94 and a deficiency of $33,929.20 for 1918, after deducting the taxes theretofore assessed against [600]*600the several corporations in the total amount of $395,610.74. This statutory deficiency notice set forth the amounts of taxes which had been formally assessed against the several corporations, including the additional payment of $100,000 by the American Company on November 17,. 1921. This deficiency notice allowed the request on behalf of the consolidated group for determination of the excess profits tax under Section 328 of the Revenue Act of 1918, and concluded with the following statement:

In accordance with the above conclusions, your claim for the refund of $45,000 filed by American Textile Woolen Company, abatement of $5,541.09 filed by the Park Woolen Mills, and abatement of $32,341.24 filed by the Louisville Woolen Mills, aggregating $82,882.33 will be rejected.
The Collector of Internal Revenue for your district will be officially notified at the expiration of thirty days from the date of this letter of the rejection.
Upon receipt of notice and demand from that official, payment should be made to his office, in accordance with the conditions of his notice.

The American Company appealed to the Tax Court for a redetermination of the deficiency for 1918, and also for 1917 and 1919. Among other issues raised in this proceeding by the American Textile "Woolen Company were (1) that the deficiencies asserted were barred by the statute of limitations, and (2) that in his determination of the deficiencies the Commissioner erred in allocating the consolidated tax liability of the consolidated group to the American Textile Woolen Company. The Tax Court held (23 B. T. A.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Standard Accident Ins. Co. v. United States
97 F. Supp. 829 (Court of Claims, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 F. Supp. 1003, 117 Ct. Cl. 580, 39 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1148, 1950 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/royal-indemnity-co-v-united-states-cc-1950.