Royal Hickman Industries v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Royal Hickman Industries v. United States

26 Cust. Ct. 384, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 361

United States Customs Court·Decided March 19, 1951·No. No. 55369; petition 6641-R (Memphis)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

At the trial counsel for petitioner requested permission of the court to submit the petition “without prejudice so that the petitioner might refile this petition for remission after final judgment or adjudication by the Court in compliance with Rule Twenty-five of the rules of the Customs Court.” The petition was therefore dismissed without prejudice to the right of the importer to file another petition “at any time after final appraisement, but within 60 days after liquidation,” as provided in rule 25, Rules of the United States Customs Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

At the trial counsel for petitioner requested permission of the court to submit the petition “without prejudice so that the petitioner might refile this petition for remission after final judgment or adjudication by the Court in compliance with Rule Twenty-five of the rules of the Customs Court.” The petition was therefore dismissed without prejudice to the right of the importer to file another petition “at any time after final appraisement, but within 60 days after liquidation,” as provided in rule 25, Rules of the United States Customs Court.

Royal Hickman Industries v. United States, 26 Cust. Ct. 384, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 361 (cusc 1951).

Pincite

26 Cust. Ct. 384 (Royal Hickman Industries v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.