Royal Hickman Industries v. United States

28 Cust. Ct. 400, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 235
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedFebruary 18, 1952
DocketNo. 56394; petition 6845-R (Memphis)
StatusPublished

This text of 28 Cust. Ct. 400 (Royal Hickman Industries v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Royal Hickman Industries v. United States, 28 Cust. Ct. 400, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 235 (cusc 1952).

Opinion

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The president of the petitioning firm testified that the petitioner sent a check for $3,000 to its agent in Mexico in payment of 10,000 sockets; that when the merchandise was received, it was invoiced at $2,500; that petitioner did not receive a refund for the difference between $3,000 and the $2,500; and that when the merchandise arrived in this country, the witness conferred with the appraiser before making entry, made every effort to determine the true value of the merchandise, and followed the appraiser’s suggestions as to the value at which to enter the merchandise. On the record presented it was held that there was no intent to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. (Syndicate Trading Co. v. United States, 13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 409, T. D. 41339, followed.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Syndicate Trading Co. v. United States
13 Ct. Cust. 409 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 Cust. Ct. 400, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/royal-hickman-industries-v-united-states-cusc-1952.