Royal Bead Novelty Co. v. United States

28 Cust. Ct. 381, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 159
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJanuary 31, 1952
DocketNo. 56319; protests 72280-K, etc. (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 28 Cust. Ct. 381 (Royal Bead Novelty Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Royal Bead Novelty Co. v. United States, 28 Cust. Ct. 381, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 159 (cusc 1952).

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of white beads similar in all material respects to those the subject of Eitinger Bead Co. v. United States (13 Cust. Ct. 50, C. D. 867), the claims of the plaintiffs were sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eitinger Bead Co. v. United States
13 Cust. Ct. 50 (U.S. Customs Court, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 Cust. Ct. 381, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/royal-bead-novelty-co-v-united-states-cusc-1952.