Royal Bank of Canada v. Goico
34 P.R. Dec. 944, 1925 PR Sup. LEXIS 394
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Royal Bank of Canada v. Goico. Read the opinion of the Court — 35 P.R. Dec. 1056 →
Opinion
No habiéndose hecho el señalamiento de errores que exige el ar-tículo 42 del Reglamento del Tribunal Supremo y no apa-reciendo que se haya cometido error fundamental, alguno, se confirma la sentencia apelada.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Royal Bank of Canada v. Goico, 34 P.R. Dec. 944, 1925 PR Sup. LEXIS 394 (prsupreme 1925).
34 P.R. Dec. 944 (Royal Bank of Canada v. Goico) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.