Roy Neal Martin v. State
This text of Roy Neal Martin v. State (Roy Neal Martin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PER CURIAM
The appellant's brief in each of these related appeals was originally due to be filed on March 18, 2002. On the motion of the attorney who represents the four appellants, the time for filing was extended to May 2. Counsel subsequently filed an untimely second motion, asking that the time for filing be extended to June 17. To date, no brief has been tendered for filing.
The second motion for extension of time is dismissed. Counsel for appellants, Mr. John Fahle, is ordered to tender a brief or briefs on appellants' behalf no later than July 24, 2002. No further extension of time will be granted.
It is ordered July 10, 2002.
Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices B. A. Smith and Yeakel
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Roy Neal Martin v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roy-neal-martin-v-state-texapp-2002.