Rowland v. Rowland

Supreme Court of Georgia

Rowland v. Rowland

227 S.E.2d 49, 237 Ga. 178, 1976 Ga. LEXIS 1190

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 30, 1976·No. 31236·Published

Opinion

Jordan, Justice.

After a careful review of the record, we conclude that the trial court did not err in modifying the divorce decree between the parties, after a full hearing, so as to increase the visitation rights of the appellee father. Githens v. [179]*179Githens, 235 Ga. 657 (221 SE2d 428) (1975).

Submitted June 7, 1976 Decided June 30, 1976. Leon A. Wilson, II, for appellant. Hoyt & Boatright, Jimmy J. Boatright, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jordan, Justice.

After a careful review of the record, we conclude that the trial court did not err in modifying the divorce decree between the parties, after a full hearing, so as to increase the visitation rights of the appellee father. Githens v. [179]*179Githens, 235 Ga. 657 (221 SE2d 428) (1975).

Submitted June 7, 1976 Decided June 30, 1976. Leon A. Wilson, II, for appellant. Hoyt & Boatright, Jimmy J. Boatright, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Rowland v. Rowland, 227 S.E.2d 49, 237 Ga. 178, 1976 Ga. LEXIS 1190 (Ga. 1976).

Pincite

227 S.E.2d 49 (Rowland v. Rowland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related