Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Githens v. Githens

Githens v. Githens

217 S.E.2d 291, 234 Ga. 715, 1975 Ga. LEXIS 1236
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 1, 1975
Docket30029
StatusPublished
Cited by25 cases

This text of 217 S.E.2d 291 (Githens v. Githens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Githens v. Githens, 217 S.E.2d 291, 234 Ga. 715, 1975 Ga. LEXIS 1236 (Ga. 1975).

Opinion

Per curiam.

This action was brought by the mother of two children to obtain their custody from their father. The father contends that he is entitled to retain custody of the children because of a change in conditions affecting their welfare since the rendition of the divorce. After a hearing the trial court awarded custody of the children to their father. The mother appeals to this court. Held:

1. The mother contends that she was entitled to a judgment on the pleadings since she was awarded custody of the children by the divorce decree. There is no merit in this contention since the father’s pleadings showed a change of circumstances had occurred since the divorce decree was entered.

2. The mother contends that the court erred in rendering a final judgment without making findings of fact. Code Ann. § 81A-152 (a) provides: "In all actions in superior court tried upon the facts without jury, except *716 actions involving only uncontested divorce, alimony and custody of minors, the court shall find the facts specially and state separately its conclusions of law thereon...” Ga. L. 1969, pp. 645,646; 1970, pp. 170,171. This Code section requires findings of facts and conclusions of law in contested divorce, contested alimony and contested custody of children actions. The section is mandatory. Therefore, the trial court is directed to enter the findings of fact and conclusions of law on which its decision is based. Doyal Development Co. v. Blair, 234 Ga. 261.

Argued June 11, 1975 Decided July 1, 1975. Carman Lavender, for appellant. Jack T. Elrod, for appellee.

Judgment reversed with direction.

All the Justices concur, except Nichols, C. J., and Undercofler, P. J., who dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sadler v. Rigsby
790 S.E.2d 639 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2016)
Bonds v. Bonds
527 S.E.2d 215 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1999)
Greene County v. North Shore Resort at Lake Oconee, LLC
517 S.E.2d 553 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1999)
Doe v. Chambers
374 S.E.2d 758 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1988)
Sills v. Bruce
347 S.E.2d 685 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1986)
Jordan v. Jordan
345 S.E.2d 675 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1986)
Couch v. Couch
341 S.E.2d 303 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1986)
Flowers v. Robinson
278 S.E.2d 38 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1981)
Rude v. Rude
246 S.E.2d 311 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1978)
Karlsberg v. Hoover
236 S.E.2d 520 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)
Wilbanks v. Wilbanks
234 S.E.2d 915 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1977)
Mullis v. Mullis
232 S.E.2d 60 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1977)
Coleman v. Coleman
232 S.E.2d 57 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1977)
Cunnane v. Cunnane
229 S.E.2d 431 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1976)
Motes v. Stanton
228 S.E.2d 831 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1976)
Brown v. Brown
227 S.E.2d 360 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1976)
Adair v. Adair
224 S.E.2d 21 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1976)
Jardine v. Jardine
223 S.E.2d 668 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1976)
Haralson v. Moore
223 S.E.2d 107 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1976)
Nodvin v. Nodvin
221 S.E.2d 404 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
217 S.E.2d 291, 234 Ga. 715, 1975 Ga. LEXIS 1236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/githens-v-githens-ga-1975.