Rowe v. Rodriguez-Schmidt
This text of 51 So. 3d 1238 (Rowe v. Rodriguez-Schmidt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jose Rodriguez-Schmidt filed a postdis-solution petition seeking to reduce the child support he pays Michelle Rowe and to modify his obligation to pay the unreim-bursed medical expenses of the parties’ child. The circuit court granted the petition, and Ms. Rowe has appealed on numerous grounds. We affirm without discussion on all her points save one. 1
We reverse the circuit court’s determination that each party should be responsible for half of the child’s unreimbursed medical expenses. If such noncovered expenses are not factored into the child support guidelines calculation, and they were not in this case, responsibility for the expenses should be apportioned based on the parties’ relative incomes. See Wilcox v. Munoz, 35 So.3d 136, 141 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010); Martinez v. Martinez, 911 So.2d 288, 289-90 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005). Mr. Rodriguez-Schmidt’s income is greater than his former wife’s. We reverse and remand with directions to recalculate the parties’ responsibility for the child’s unreimbursed medical expenses based on their relative incomes.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
. Mr. Rodriguez-Schmidt also asked the court to award him the income tax deduction for his son. The court did so, but Ms. Rowe does not challenge that decision on appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
51 So. 3d 1238, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 187, 2011 WL 148815, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rowe-v-rodriguez-schmidt-fladistctapp-2011.