Rover Pipeline LLC v. Zwick
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
ROVER PIPELINE LLC, : : Plaintiff, : Case No. 2:19-cv-4698 : v. : Chief Judge Algenon L. Marbley : AMY M. ZWICK, et al., : Magistrate Judge Jolson : Defendants. :
ORDER
On March 24, 2022, this Court issued an Opinion and Order denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 68), granting in part Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 69), and remanding Plaintiff’s remaining state law claims to the Monroe County Common Pleas Court. (See ECF No. 94). As detailed in that Opinion and Order, “[w]hen all federal claims are dismissed before trial, the balance of considerations usually will point to” dismissing the state law claims or remanding them to the state court where the action originated. Musson Theatrical v. Federal Express Corp., 89 F.3d 1244, 1254–55 (6th Cir. 1996). Based on representations from Defendants (see ECF No. 69 at 34), this Court was under the impression that a remand would be in order. On review, however, the proper course of action is to dismiss these state law claims without prejudice. Musson Theatrical, Inc., 89 F.3d at 1254–55 (“When all federal claims are dismissed before trial, the balance of considerations usually will point to dismissing the state law claims or remanding them to state court, if the action was removed.”) (emphasis added). Accordingly, Plaintiffs remaining state law claims, as detailed in this Court’s Opinion & Order (see ECF No. 94), are DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter an amended judgment. IT IS SO ORDERED. Ls aoe Mass CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DATED: March 29, 2022
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Zwick (Rover Pipeline LLC v. Zwick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.