Routt v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen

168 N.W. 599, 102 Neb. 642, 1918 Neb. LEXIS 125
Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided July 8, 1918·No. No. 19503·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

For the reasons stated in the opinion in Kane v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, p. 645, post, the judgment of affirmance heretofore entered herein is set aside, the judgment of the district court is reversed, and the action dismissed.

Reversed and dismissed.

Hamer, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Routt v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, 168 N.W. 599, 102 Neb. 642, 1918 Neb. LEXIS 125 (Neb. 1918).

168 N.W. 599 (Routt v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Loos v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen
2 N.E.2d 244 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1936)