Rouss v. Bardwil

255 A.D. 858, 7 N.Y.S.2d 527, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5669
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 4, 1938·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In an action brought under article 15 of the Real Property Law to cancel and discharge of record a restrictive covenant forbidding the use of plaintiffs’ property for any purpose except that of single family residences, judgment in favor of plaintiffs unanimously affirmed, with costs. The language of the covenant, and the suirounding circumstances, justify the conclusion that the restriction was imposed for the protection of the grantor’s neighboring residence, and that it ceased to have any effect when the residence was sold to others and replaced by a large apartment building. (Reeves v. Constable, 87 App. Div. 352.) Present — Hagarty, Davis, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rouss v. Bardwil, 255 A.D. 858, 7 N.Y.S.2d 527, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5669 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

255 A.D. 858 (Rouss v. Bardwil) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Longdowd Corp. v. Straight Improvement Co.
39 Misc. 2d 1005 (New York Supreme Court, 1963)
Congregation Khal Chasidim of Brooklyn, Inc. v. Congregation Beth El of Borough Park
19 A.D.2d 622 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1963)
Brown v. Williams
3 A.D.2d 939 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1957)