Congregation Khal Chasidim of Brooklyn, Inc. v. Congregation Beth El of Borough Park

19 A.D.2d 622, 241 N.Y.S.2d 100, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3665

This text of 19 A.D.2d 622 (Congregation Khal Chasidim of Brooklyn, Inc. v. Congregation Beth El of Borough Park) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Congregation Khal Chasidim of Brooklyn, Inc. v. Congregation Beth El of Borough Park, 19 A.D.2d 622, 241 N.Y.S.2d 100, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3665 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Opinion

'In an action under article 15 of the Real Property Law to cancel and discharge of record a covenant which, inter alla, restricted the use of plaintiff’s real property to two-family residences, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered May 9, 1962 after trial before a Special Referee upon the decision of the Referee, dismissing the complaint on the merits. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Although the record supports [623]*623plaintiff’s claim of substantial change in the character of the neighborhood, relief from the restrictive covenant will not be afforded where, as here, the restrictions are of substantial value to the property to which the covenant appertains (Rowland v. Miller, 139 N. Y. 93; cf. Winston v. 524 West End Ave., 233 App. Div. 5; cf. Bouss v. Bardwil, 255 App. Div. 858, affd. 280 N. Y. 737). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ, concur; Kleinfeld, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rowland v. . Miller
34 N.E. 765 (New York Court of Appeals, 1893)
Rouss v. Bardwil
21 N.E.2d 514 (New York Court of Appeals, 1939)
Winston v. 524 West End Ave., Inc.
233 A.D. 5 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1931)
Rouss v. Bardwil
255 A.D. 858 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 A.D.2d 622, 241 N.Y.S.2d 100, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/congregation-khal-chasidim-of-brooklyn-inc-v-congregation-beth-el-of-nyappdiv-1963.