Roundtree v. San Jose

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided July 19, 2019·No. 1:19-cv-02475-JMF-JW·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JUEL ROUNDTREE, Plaintiff, -against- 19-CV-2475 (JMF) NYC; NY HEALTH & HOSPS; CORIZON MEDICAL; MEDICAL ADMINISTRATOR ORDER OF SERVICE ROBERTS; DR. ARKADY CHERCHOVER; GRVC DENTIST (JOHN DOE #1); DR. SAN JOSE; JANE DOES # 1-5; JOHN DOES # 2-10, Defendants. JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge: Plaintiff, currently incarcerated in Marcy Correctional Facility, brings this pro se action alleging that, while he was detained in the George R. Vierno Center (GRVC) on Rikers Island, Defendants violated his constitutional rights. Plaintiff paid the requisite fees to file this action. A. Service on H+H, Corizon Medical, Dr. Arkady Cherchover, and Dr. San Jose The Clerk of Court is directed to issue summonses as to Defendants H+H, Corizon Medical, Dr. Arkady Cherchover, and Dr. San Jose. Plaintiff is directed to serve the summons and complaint on Defendants within 90 days of the issuance of the summons. If within those 90 days, Plaintiff has not either served Defendants or requested an extension of time to do so, the Court may dismiss the claims against Defendants under Rules 4 and 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to prosecute. B. Service on the City of New York The Clerk of Court is directed to issue a summons as to the City of New York and to notify the New York City Department of Correction and the New York City Law Department of this order. The Court requests that the City of New York waive service of summons. C. Medical Administrator Roberts and GRVC Dentist (John Doe # 1) Under Valentin v. Dinkins, a pro se litigant is entitled to assistance from the district court in identifying a defendant. 121 F.3d 72, 76 (2d Cir. 1997). In the complaint, Plaintiff supplies sufficient information to permit H+H to identify Medical Administrator Roberts and GRVC Dentist (John Doe # 1). It is therefore ordered that H+H shall ascertain the identities of Medical

Administrator Roberts and GRVC Dentist (John Doe # 1) whom Plaintiff seeks to sue here and the addresses where these Defendants may be served. H+H shall provide this information to Plaintiff and the Court within sixty days of the date of this order. Within thirty days of receiving this information, Plaintiff must file an amended complaint naming the John Doe Defendants. The amended complaint will replace, not supplement, the original complaint. An Amended Civil Rights Complaint form that Plaintiff should complete is attached to this order. Once Plaintiff has filed an amended complaint, the Court will screen the amended complaint and, if necessary, issue an order directing service on Defendants. D. Jane Does # 1−5 and John Does # 2−10 Plaintiff names unidentified Jane Does # 1−5 and John Does # 2−10 in the caption of his complaint but does not plead any facts in the body of the complaint about what any of these

Defendants did or failed to do that violated his rights. A pro se litigant is entitled under Valentin v. Dinkins, to assistance from the district court in identifying a defendant. 121 F.3d 72, 76 (2d Cir. 1997). But Plaintiff does not supply sufficient information that would allow identification of these Defendants. Thus, the Court declines at this time to issue a Valentin order as to these Defendants but will revisit the matter at a later date, if necessary. CONCLUSION The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff, together with an information package. The Clerk of Court is instructed to issue summonses as to Defendants the City of New York, H+H, Corizon Medical, Dr. Arkady Cherchover, and Dr. San Jose. Plaintiff is directed to serve the summons and complaint on each of these Defendants within 90 days of the issuance of the summonses. The Clerk of Court is directed to electronically notify the New York City Department of Correction and the New York City Law Department of this order. The Court requests that Defendants the City of New York waive service of summons. The Clerk of Court is directed to docket this as a “written opinion” within the meaning of Section 205(a)(5) of the E-Government Act of 2002. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Dated: July 18, 2019 New York, New York JESSR.MW FURMAN nited States District Judge

DEFENDANTS AND SERVICE ADDRESSES

H+H 125 Worth Street New York, New York 10013 Corizon Medical 103 Powell Court Brentwood, TN 37027 Dr. Arkady Cherchover c/o Marella Lowe, Assistant Director of Medical Records NYC Health + Hospital AGNY – Correctional Health Services 49-04 19th Avenue 1st Floor Astoria, New York 11105 Dr. San Jose c/o Gwendolyn Renee Tarver PAGNY – Correctional Health Services 49-04 19th Avenue 1st Floor Astoria, New York 11105 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

_____CV_______________ Write the full name of each plaintiff. (Include case number if one has been assigned)

AMENDED -against- COMPLAINT (Prisoner) Do you want a jury trial? ☐ Yes ☐ No

Write the full name of each defendant. If you cannot fit the names of all of the defendants in the space provided, please write “see attached” in the space above and attach an additional sheet of paper with the full list of names. The names listed above must be identical to those contained in Section IV.

NOTICE The public can access electronic court files. For privacy and security reasons, papers filed with the court should therefore not contain: an individual’s full social security number or full birth date; the full name of a person known to be a minor; or a complete financial account number. A filing may include only: the last four digits of a social security number; the year of an individual’s birth; a minor’s initials; and the last four digits of a financial account number. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. I. LEGAL BASIS FOR CLAIM State below the federal legal basis for your claim, if known. This form is designed primarily for prisoners challenging the constitutionality of their conditions of confinement; those claims are often brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (against state, county, or municipal defendants) or in a “Bivens” action (against federal defendants). ☐ Violation of my federal constitutional rights ☐ Other: II. PLAINTIFF INFORMATION Each plaintiff must provide the following information. Attach additional pages if necessary.

First Name Middle Initial Last Name

State any other names (or different forms of your name) you have ever used, including any name you have used in previously filing a lawsuit.

Prisoner ID # (if you have previously been in another agency’s custody, please specify each agency and the ID number (such as your DIN or NYSID) under which you were held)

Current Place of Detention

Institutional Address

County, City State Zip Code III.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roundtree v. San Jose, (S.D.N.Y. 2019).

Roundtree v. San Jose (Roundtree v. San Jose) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related