Roto Bag Machine Corp. v. United States
56 Cust. Ct. 907, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1497
United States Customs Court·Decided May 19, 1966·No. No. P66/63; protests 64/9661, etc. (New York)·Published
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of parts essential to and dedicated to use with bag-making machines similar in all material respects to those the subject of Roto Bag Machine Corp. and Rohner, Gehrig & Co., Inc. v. United States (48 Cust Ct. 401, Abstract 66656), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Roto Bag Machine Corp. v. United States, 56 Cust. Ct. 907, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1497 (cusc 1966).
56 Cust. Ct. 907 (Roto Bag Machine Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.