Roto Bag Machine Corp. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Roto Bag Machine Corp. v. United States

56 Cust. Ct. 895, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1542

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedMarch 31, 1966

DocketNo. P66/12; protest 64/25284 (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 56 Cust. Ct. 895 (Roto Bag Machine Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roto Bag Machine Corp. v. United States, 56 Cust. Ct. 895, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1542 (cusc 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of bag-making machines and parts thereof which parts are dedicated to use on or for said bag-making machines similar in all material respects to those the subject of Roto Bag Machine Corp. and Rohner, Gehrig & Co., Inc. v. United States (48 Cust. Ct. 401, Abstract 66656), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of bag-making machines and parts thereof which parts are dedicated to use on or for said bag-making machines similar in all material respects to those the subject of Roto Bag Machine Corp. and Rohner, Gehrig & Co., Inc. v. United States (48 Cust. Ct. 401, Abstract 66656), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 Cust. Ct. 895, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1542, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roto-bag-machine-corp-v-united-states-cusc-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack