Roto Bag Machine Corp. v. United States
56 Cust. Ct. 895, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1542
United States Customs Court·Decided March 31, 1966·No. No. P66/12; protest 64/25284 (New York)·Published
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of bag-making machines and parts thereof which parts are dedicated to use on or for said bag-making machines similar in all material respects to those the subject of Roto Bag Machine Corp. and Rohner, Gehrig & Co., Inc. v. United States (48 Cust. Ct. 401, Abstract 66656), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Roto Bag Machine Corp. v. United States, 56 Cust. Ct. 895, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1542 (cusc 1966).
56 Cust. Ct. 895 (Roto Bag Machine Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Roto Bag Machine Corp. v. United States
48 Cust. Ct. 401 (U.S. Customs Court, 1962)