Rothstein v. Jefferson Ice Mfg. Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Rothstein v. Jefferson Ice Mfg. Co.

9 A.2d 149, 137 Pa. Super. 298, 1939 Pa. Super. LEXIS 44

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 3, 1939·No. Appeal, 169·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam,

A review of the record in this case satisfies us that no error was committed by the court below in dismissing the exceptions filed by the appellant to the findings of fact and conclusions of law and. the rulings of President Judge Finletter, sitting as Chancellor, and entering the final decree appealed from.

The decree is affirmed, at the costs of the appellant, on the findings of fact, conclusions of law and discussion of the Chancellor.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam,

A review of the record in this case satisfies us that no error was committed by the court below in dismissing the exceptions filed by the appellant to the findings of fact and conclusions of law and. the rulings of President Judge Finletter, sitting as Chancellor, and entering the final decree appealed from.

The decree is affirmed, at the costs of the appellant, on the findings of fact, conclusions of law and discussion of the Chancellor.

Rothstein v. Jefferson Ice Mfg. Co., 9 A.2d 149, 137 Pa. Super. 298, 1939 Pa. Super. LEXIS 44 (Pa. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

9 A.2d 149 (Rothstein v. Jefferson Ice Mfg. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related