Rothschild v. Rothschild

40 A.D.2d 973, 339 N.Y.S.2d 428, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2983
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 28, 1972·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered October 3, 1972, unanimously modified, on the law, the facts, and in the exercise of dis[974]*974cretion, to the extent of allocating the award therein of temporary alimony and child support of $550 per week so as to provide that $200 per week be paid as temporary alimony to the wife and $350 per week as and for the support of the infant children, and, as so modified, the order is otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. In the circumstances of this case, we conclude that in view of the tax consequences to the wife of awarding a lump sum to include alimony and child support (see Commissioner v. Lester, 366 U. S. 299), it was an improvident exercise of discretion not to allocate and divide the amounts to be paid as temporary alimony and for the support of the children. In other respects, we find the order appealed from to be unassailable. Concur — McGivern, J. P., Nunez, Murphy, Steuer and Capozzoli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rothschild v. Rothschild, 40 A.D.2d 973, 339 N.Y.S.2d 428, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2983 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

40 A.D.2d 973 (Rothschild v. Rothschild) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schwartz v. Schwartz
81 A.D.2d 535 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)