Roth v. Hotel Riverside Plaza, Inc.

188 Misc. 180, 67 N.Y.S.2d 518, 1947 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1982
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided January 9, 1947·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Memobahdum Plaintiff was admittedly indebted to defendant for unpaid rent and it had the right to retain possession of any property stored with it until the debt was paid (Lien Law, § 181). Plaintiff not having paid the same was, therefore, not entitled to immediate possession. Such payment was a condition precedent to making out a cause of [181]*181action in conversion (Jackson v. Appleton, 50 Hun 604, opinion in 2 N. Y. S. 787). Moreover, the mere loss of the property does not constitute a tortious conversion (Salt Springs National Bank v. Wheeler, 48 N. Y. 492, 495; Magnin v. Dinsmore, 70 N. Y. 410, 417).

The judgment should he reversed, with $30 costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.

Hammer, Shientag and Edeb, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roth v. Hotel Riverside Plaza, Inc., 188 Misc. 180, 67 N.Y.S.2d 518, 1947 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1982 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

188 Misc. 180 (Roth v. Hotel Riverside Plaza, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. West
328 F. Supp. 545 (D. Delaware, 1971)
United States v. Robert Cowan
396 F.2d 83 (Second Circuit, 1968)
United States v. Cowan
37 F.R.D. 215 (S.D. New York, 1965)