Rossmann v. Netanyahu

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

FILED

) BRUD RossMAN, ) ) DEC -4 2017 Plaimiff, ) all 0»8. mccrm a mar ) m form Dlstrlct of Co|s?nt; a v ) Civil Action No. 17-2157 (UNA) ) BENJAM[N NETANYAHU, et al. , ) ) Defendants. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on the plaintiff s application to proceed in forma pauperis

and his pro se civil complaint

Complaints filed by pro se litigants are held to less stringent standards than those applied to formal pleadings drafted by lawyers. See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the F ederal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tz`sch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the Court’s jurisdiction depends, a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). The purpose of the minimum standard of Rule 8 is to give fair notice to the defendants of the claim being asserted, sufficient to prepare a responsive answer, to prepare an adequate defense and to determine whether the doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Call`fano, 75 F.R.D. 497,

498 (D.D.C. 1977).

The Court has reviewed plaintiffs complaint and its attachments Aside from making disparaging remarks about the defendants, plaintiff alleges no facts to suggest the existence of a viable legal claim over which this Court has subject matter jurisdiction. Therefore, the Court will dismiss the complaint without prejudice An Order accompanies this Memorandum

Opinion.

DATE; ll/bl /,lOt 7 /M //I::-

United StM District Judge