Ross v. Walton
52 A. 1132, 67 N.J.L. 688, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 152
Opinion
The judgment below - is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Mr. Justice Lippineott, reported in 34 Vroom 435.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Dixon, Garrison, Collins, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Krueger, Vredenburgh, Voorhees. 12.
For reversal — Vroom. 1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ross v. Walton, 52 A. 1132, 67 N.J.L. 688, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 152 (N.J. 1902).
52 A. 1132 (Ross v. Walton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
City of Atlantic City v. N.J. Economic Development Authority
5 N.J. Tax 137 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1983)
Bd. of Ed. Fair Lawn v. Mayor, Coun. Fair Lawn
362 A.2d 1270 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1976)
Robinson v. Cahill
358 A.2d 457 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1976)
Borough of Totowa v. American Surety Co. of New York
188 A.2d 586 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1963)