Ross v. State

198 So. 3d 1147, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13011, 2016 WL 4524700
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 29, 2016·No. No. 1D13-4401·Published

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

PER CURIAM.

Our original opinion in this case reversed appellant’s convictions for attempted second-degree murder and shooting at, within, .or into an occupied vehicle based on this court’s decision in Floyd v. State, 151. So.3d 452 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (Floyd /). The Florida Supreme Court quashed Floyd I in State v. Floyd, 186 So.3d 1013 (Fla.2016) (Floyd II), and also quashed our original opinion in this case and remanded “for reconsideration upon the application of [the] decision in [Floyd II ].”

Applying Floyd II, we find that the jury instructions in this case on the duty to retreat were not fundamentally erroneous. Moreover, we find that the remaining issues raised by appellant are without merit. As such, we affirm appellant’s judgment and sentence.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ross v. State, 198 So. 3d 1147, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13011, 2016 WL 4524700 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

198 So. 3d 1147 (Ross v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State of Florida v. Robert Franklin Floyd
186 So. 3d 1013 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2016)