Ross v. State

145 So. 3d 207, 2014 WL 4057371, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12682
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ross v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6309
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 18, 2014·No. No. 1D13-4930·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s resolution of Appellant’s successive collateral attack on his judgment and sentence in lower case number 08-CF-1290 — and we do so with[208]*208out comment. We write only to warn Appellant, much like the trial court did. Appellant has now filed four pro se, collateral attacks in this Court, all related to case number 08-CF-1290; and all to no avail. Appellant is warned that additional collateral attacks on this conviction and sentence, if again successive and improper, may result in sanctions, including an order from this Court barring Appellant from filing additional collateral attacks to his judgment and sentence without obtaining the endorsement of a licensed attorney, as well as referral to the Department of Corrections for disciplinary procedures.

The trial court’s order on appeal is AFFIRMED.

VAN NORTWICK, CLARK, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ross v. State, 145 So. 3d 207, 2014 WL 4057371, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12682 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

145 So. 3d 207 (Ross v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.