Ross v. State

862 So. 2d 920, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19777, 2003 WL 23094710
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ross v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 804 So. 2d 359
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 31, 2003·No. No. 2D03-1361·Published

Opinion

WHATLEY, Judge.

We affirm Julius Ross’s convictions and sentences, but we remand for correction of the judgment to reflect that under count III, Ross was convicted of violating section 316.1935(2), Florida Statutes (1999), and it is a third-degree felony.

Affirmed and remanded with directions.

SALCINES and CANADY, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ross v. State, 862 So. 2d 920, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19777, 2003 WL 23094710 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

862 So. 2d 920 (Ross v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.