Ross v. State

856 So. 2d 1042, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 13291, 2003 WL 22056391
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 5, 2003·No. No. 1D03-2885·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of July 23, 2003, the Court has determined that the notice of appeal was not timely filed because the motion for rehearing was not filed within fifteen days of the date of service of the trial court’s order. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed.

DISMISSED.

BOOTH, VAN NORTWICK and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ross v. State, 856 So. 2d 1042, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 13291, 2003 WL 22056391 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

856 So. 2d 1042 (Ross v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ross v. State
882 So. 2d 440 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)