Ross v. State
This text of 869 So. 2d 770 (Ross v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Samuel ROSS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Samuel Ross, Jasper, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Samuel Ross appeals an order entered January 9, 2004, summarily denying his motion for postconviction relief, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The trial court was without jurisdiction to rule on this motion because Ross's direct appeal is still pending before this court, filed through counsel on October 2, 2003. See Cazeau v. State, 858 So.2d 1213 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).
Therefore, as we did in Cazeau, we vacate the January 9, 2004 order and direct the trial court to dismiss the motion without prejudice. Ross shall be allowed to refile, without the penalties affixed to successive motions as announced in rule 3.850(f), after this court issues its mandate in the pending case, 4D03-3838. See id.; Daniels v. State, 712 So.2d 765 (Fla.1998).
GUNTHER, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
869 So. 2d 770, 2004 WL 784396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ross-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.