Ross v. State

601 So. 2d 640, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8222, 1992 WL 164177
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ross v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 579 So. 2d 877
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 17, 1992·No. No. 91-2205·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders1 appeal, Michael Angelo Ross appeals his conviction for sale or delivery of cocaine. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

We write only to acknowledge appellant’s claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel upon which we do not rule. Such a claim is more properly raised in a motion for postconviction relief. McKinney v. State, 579 So.2d 80 (Fla.1991). Our affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s right to raise the claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel by way of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

AFFIRMED.

SHIVERS, MINER and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ross v. State, 601 So. 2d 640, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8222, 1992 WL 164177 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

601 So. 2d 640 (Ross v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
McKinney v. State
579 So. 2d 80 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)