Rosenthal v. Jackson

125 A.D. 895, 110 N.Y.S. 786, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2929
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 29, 1908·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam :

From the papers it appears that the plaintiff has sufficient knowledge to frame a complaint to compel the defendants to account for such moneys as they had received and for which they were accountable to the plaintiff’s testator. She is not entitled to an examination of the defendants before serving her complaint for the purpose of determining whether she has a cause of action.

The order appealed from is, therefore, reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion to vacate the order for the examination of the defendants granted.

Present — Ingraham, McLaughlin, Clabke, Houghton and Scott, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rosenthal v. Jackson, 125 A.D. 895, 110 N.Y.S. 786, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2929 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

125 A.D. 895 (Rosenthal v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

White v. Improved Property Holding Co.
118 N.Y.S. 1057 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)