White v. Improved Property Holding Co.

134 A.D. 948

This text of 134 A.D. 948 (White v. Improved Property Holding Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
White v. Improved Property Holding Co., 134 A.D. 948 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1909).

Opinion

Clarke, J.:

The moving papers affirmatively establish that the plaintiff has all the information necessary to enable him to frame his complaint. Therefore, he needs no examination of the defendant for that purpose and the order appealed from was improvident. (Waitzfelder v. Moses Sons & Co., 120 App. Div. 144; Matter of Gardner, 124 id. 654; Rosenthal v. Jackson, 125 id. 895.) After the issue is joined, if it become necessary to examine the defendant for the purpose of obtaining evidence necessary and material for use upon the trial, a proper application for such relief can be made. The order appealed from should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Ingraham, Laughlin, Houghton and Scott, JJ., concurred. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Waitzfelder v. A. Moses Sons & Co.
120 A.D. 144 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 A.D. 948, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-improved-property-holding-co-nyappdiv-1909.