Rosenblatt v. New York State Tax Commission
This text of 498 N.E.2d 148 (Rosenblatt v. New York State Tax Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), judgment insofar as appealed from reversed, with costs, and the Tax Commission’s determination of a deficiency against petitioner Rosenblatt reinstated for reasons stated in the concurring in part and dissenting in part opinion by Justice Ann T. Mikoll at the Appellate Division (114 AD2d 127, 132-133).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
498 N.E.2d 148, 68 N.Y.2d 775, 506 N.Y.S.2d 675, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 20028, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenblatt-v-new-york-state-tax-commission-ny-1986.