Rosenberg v. Wisconsin

Supreme Court

Rosenberg v. Wisconsin

290 U.S. 600, 54 S. Ct. 230, 78 L. Ed. 527, 1933 U.S. LEXIS 512

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedDecember 11, 1933

DocketNo. 598

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 290 U.S. 600 (Rosenberg v. Wisconsin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosenberg v. Wisconsin, 290 U.S. 600, 54 S. Ct. 230, 78 L. Ed. 527, 1933 U.S. LEXIS 512 (1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. (1) [601]*601Meuller v. Illinois, 289 U.S. 711; Leach v. California, 287 U.S. 579, 580; Lavine v. California, 286 U.S. 528; Sproles v. Binford, 286 U.S. 374, 393; Bandini v. Superior Court, 284 U.S. 8, 18; Hygrade Provision Co. v. Sherman, 266 U.S. 497, 501-503. (2) Durland v. United States, 161 U.S. 306, 315; Husty v. United States, 282 U.S. 694, 702. (3) Portland Ry. Co. v. Oregon Railroad Comm’n, 229 U.S. 397, 411, 412; Pure Oil Co. v. Minnesota, 248 U.S. 158, 164; Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Dunken, 266 U.S. 389, 394.

Messrs. Wm. E. Leahy and Wm. J. Hughes, Jr., for appellant. Mr. Fred M. Wylie for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. (1) [601]*601Meuller v. Illinois, 289 U.S. 711; Leach v. California, 287 U.S. 579, 580; Lavine v. California, 286 U.S. 528; Sproles v. Binford, 286 U.S. 374, 393; Bandini v. Superior Court, 284 U.S. 8, 18; Hygrade Provision Co. v. Sherman, 266 U.S. 497, 501-503. (2) Durland v. United States, 161 U.S. 306, 315; Husty v. United States, 282 U.S. 694, 702. (3) Portland Ry. Co. v. Oregon Railroad Comm’n, 229 U.S. 397, 411, 412; Pure Oil Co. v. Minnesota, 248 U.S. 158, 164; Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Dunken, 266 U.S. 389, 394.

Messrs. Wm. E. Leahy and Wm. J. Hughes, Jr., for appellant. Mr. Fred M. Wylie for appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

290 U.S. 600, 54 S. Ct. 230, 78 L. Ed. 527, 1933 U.S. LEXIS 512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenberg-v-wisconsin-scotus-1933.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack