Leach v. California

287 U.S. 579, 53 S. Ct. 313
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 9, 1933·No. No. 441·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co., 242 U. S. 539; Caldwell v. Sioux Falls Stock Yards Co., 242 U. S. 559; Merrick v. N. W. Halsey & Co., 242 U. S. 568; Sloman v. Security Trust Co., 281 U. S. 704; Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas (No. 1), 212 U. S. 86, 109; Bandini Co. v. Superior Court, 284 U. S. 8, 18; Sproles v. Binford, 286 U. S. 374, 393.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leach v. California, 287 U.S. 579, 53 S. Ct. 313 (1933).

287 U.S. 579 (Leach v. California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Schock
152 Cal. App. 3d 379 (California Court of Appeal, 1984)
People v. Gonda
138 Cal. App. 3d 774 (California Court of Appeal, 1982)
Thompson v. Harris, Warden. Demmick v. Same
144 P.2d 761 (Utah Supreme Court, 1943)
Dill v. Colorado
292 U.S. 609 (Supreme Court, 1934)
Rosenberg v. Wisconsin
290 U.S. 600 (Supreme Court, 1933)
Mueller v. Illinois
289 U.S. 711 (Supreme Court, 1933)