Rosenberg v. United States

358 U.S. 904
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 12, 1959
Docket451
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 358 U.S. 904 (Rosenberg v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosenberg v. United States, 358 U.S. 904 (1959).

Opinion

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit granted limited to question I presented by the petition for the writ which reads as follows:

*905 Bernard Tompkins for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Anderson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Kirby W. Patterson for the United States.
“I. Is the rule of this Court in Jencks v. United States, 1957, 353 U. S. 657, a rule of mere procedure, or does it involve a defendant’s constitutional rights? May a clear violation of this rule be harmless error ? May the conceded error of a trial court in withholding from defense counsel prior statements of principal Government witnesses be excused because a Circuit Court finds that the defense was not hampered in cross-examination of those witnesses? Is it proper for a Circuit Court to determine what use defense counsel might have made of statements erroneously withheld?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Noel v. State
215 N.E.2d 539 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1966)
James Tillman, Jr. v. United States
268 F.2d 422 (Fifth Circuit, 1959)
Rosenberg v. United States
360 U.S. 367 (Supreme Court, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
358 U.S. 904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenberg-v-united-states-scotus-1959.