Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Rosedale Hutterian Brethren, Inc. v. Cornell

Rosedale Hutterian Brethren, Inc. v. Cornell

134 A.D.2d 781, 521 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50950
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 25, 1987
StatusPublished

This text of 134 A.D.2d 781 (Rosedale Hutterian Brethren, Inc. v. Cornell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosedale Hutterian Brethren, Inc. v. Cornell, 134 A.D.2d 781, 521 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50950 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Walsh, Jr., J.), entered September 24, 1986 in Hamilton County, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment.

The judgment having been entered upon defendants’ default, defendants cannot appeal (see, Taubman v Taubman, 115 AD2d 190). Defendants’ remedy is to apply to Supreme Court to vacate the judgment and, if unsuccessful, to appeal from the resulting order (see, Tongue v Tongue, 97 AD2d 638, affd 61 NY2d 809).

Appeal dismissed, with costs. Mahoney, P. J., Main, Mikoll, Yesawich Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tongue v. Tongue
462 N.E.2d 127 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
Tongue v. Tongue
97 A.D.2d 638 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Taubman v. Taubman
115 A.D.2d 190 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 A.D.2d 781, 521 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50950, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosedale-hutterian-brethren-inc-v-cornell-nyappdiv-1987.