Tongue v. Tongue
This text of 462 N.E.2d 127 (Tongue v. Tongue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[810]*810OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Both plaintiff and defendant agreed on the record in open court not to contest the allegations of each other’s claims for divorce and to take “a mutual divorce against one another.” After receiving competent oral proof of the grounds for divorce, in accordance with section 211 of the Domestic Relations Law, the court adjudged plaintiff and defendant to be absolutely divorced. Inasmuch as defendant received precisely what he had requested and stipulated to, he is not an aggrieved party within the purview of CPLR 5511. The Appellate Division, therefore, correctly dismissed his appeal.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
462 N.E.2d 127, 61 N.Y.2d 809, 473 N.Y.S.2d 950, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4081, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tongue-v-tongue-ny-1984.