Rose v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Rose v. State

1920 OK CR 206, 192 P. 1105, 18 Okla. Crim. 708, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 189

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 12, 1920

DocketNo. 3568.

StatusPublished

This text of 1920 OK CR 206 (Rose v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rose v. State, 1920 OK CR 206, 192 P. 1105, 18 Okla. Crim. 708, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 189 (Okla. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, B. Rose, was convicted on an information charging that he did have possession of intoxicating liq *709 uor witli the intention of selling the same, and was by the court sentenced to be confined in the county jail for 30 days and to pay a fine of $50. From the judgment an appeal was taken, by filing in .this court on June 12, 1919, a duly certified transcript of the record proper. No brief has been filed, and no appearance made on behalf of plaintiff in error, when the case was called for final submission.

The motion of they Attorney G-eneral to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute the appeal is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, B. Rose, was convicted on an information charging that he did have possession of intoxicating liq *709 uor witli the intention of selling the same, and was by the court sentenced to be confined in the county jail for 30 days and to pay a fine of $50. From the judgment an appeal was taken, by filing in .this court on June 12, 1919, a duly certified transcript of the record proper. No brief has been filed, and no appearance made on behalf of plaintiff in error, when the case was called for final submission.

The motion of they Attorney G-eneral to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute the appeal is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1920 OK CR 206, 192 P. 1105, 18 Okla. Crim. 708, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rose-v-state-oklacrimapp-1920.