Rose v. State
This text of 1919 OK CR 124 (Rose v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Roy Rose was convicted of the crime of conveying intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed as above stated.
This appeal has been pending in this court since the 12th day of December, 1917. No brief has been filed in behalf of plaintiff in error, and no appearance was made to orally argue the cause at the time same was submitted.
Rule IX of this court provides:
“When no counsel appears, and no briefs are filed, the court will examine the pleadings, the instructions of the court and the exceptions taken thereto, and the judgment and sentence, and if no prejudicial error appears, will affirm the judgment.”
After an examination of the entire record, including a transcript of the evidence, the court finds that no prejudicial error occurred during the progress of the trial sufficient to authorize a reversal of this judgment, and the same is, therefore, affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1919 OK CR 124, 179 P. 356, 15 Okla. Crim. 695, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 75, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rose-v-state-oklacrimapp-1919.